Editorial

It has been an honor serving as your Mayor and Councilmember over the past eight years. I have lived in Healdsburg my entire life. I attended local public schools and have served our community for more than 35 years: 28 years with the Healdsburg Police Department, and eight years as a Councilmember and Mayor.  

Matthew Hall was hired as a reporter for the Healdsburg Tribune in 2006. He has been the editor of the Windsor Times for seven years, and during that time also served as the Tribune’s editor during vacations and maternity leaves.

The March 24 commentary “Housing Solutions” by Healdsburg Mayor Tom Chambers provided an incomplete picture of the City of Healdsburg’s efforts to dramatically change the Growth Management Ordinance (GMO) that voters passed in 2000.

I want to earn your vote! You and I have the great pleasure to live in Healdsburg where, for over 150 years, people have built a great community, come to each other’s aid when required, and looked forward to an ongoing future of growth and prosperity. I believe we are now at a crossroads. One where your future city leaders will decide whether we can afford to do all the great things we want to do.

For some members of the Healdsburg community who took pride in Healdsburg being a big school district, enrollment decline may seem unfavorable. However, the research over the last 30 years on school size has demonstrated over and over that less is more. HUSD’s current enrollment of 1,850 students is an advantage, not just because there is more money per student but also because of the more intimate, personalized learning environment it creates. Our students are not just a number, but individuals with strengths, talents and challenges.

— Rollie Atkinson

Summer time and the living is easy. Especially in our cozy, friendly small towns we call home and where we welcome streams of visitors, seeking respite, fun and some genuine modern Americana.

I am running for Healdsburg City Council and as such I am one of six people running for a total of three open positions.  There are two incumbents and four new people, such as myself.  I have no doubt that each of the candidates have the interests of Healdsburg at heart.  They have to, with a salary of $150.00 per month, with very limited medical coverage and no real retirement benefits; you sure don’t do it for the money.  You surely don’t do it for the vast prestige of the position either, as there are no corporate boards to join after your retire or speaking tours that are super lucrative.  In point of fact, you end up working something on the order of 20 hours a week for a basic salary of something less than $2.00 per hour.  This is less than minimum wage in California.  Even at that, some people feel that their representatives are overpaid.  SO WHY DO IT?????  I think you have to have some issues that you feel need to be addressed and the belief that you can materially contribute to the resolution of these issues.  In my case I am very concerned about the financial well-being of the city, given the current city government salary levels and the generous retirement benefits.  This is a CURRENT problem and not a future issue that can be addressed by simply changing the conditions for new hires only.  The work force is contracting and not expanding, so the impact of new hires on the retirement system is minimal.  The city employees are very dedicated and through salary give backs and related concessions they have materially lessened the financial impact on the city.  However, these steps may not be enough and additional difficult steps may be required to achieve financial well-being for the benefit of everyone.